At a surprise Palace dinner President Arroyo told the foreign press: “I’m worried” over poll automation
I wasn’t going to write about poll automation just yet. I thought what President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo told the foreign press corps last Friday, January 22 was old hat, until I saw the presidential palace story on the dinner:
PGMA assures foreign media there will be no failure of election
President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo last night assured foreign correspondents there will be no failure of elections in May.
In a dinner she hosted for the Foreign Correspondents Association of the Philippines (FOCAP) at the Palace, the President said she was assured by the Commission on Elections (Comelec) that it is doing its best to complete the automated poll system before May. She said all the funds necessary for holding the national elections have been disbursed.
That’s funny. I did not come away from the Palace dinner feeling reassured that the automation was going great guns.

Oliver Teves of Associated Press shakes hands with President Arroyo while I (in brown coat) look on; left foreground is FOCAP president Jim Gomez; behind Jim is Dana Batnag of Jiji Press; on right background is Zhao Jiemin of Xinhua News Agency - PHOTO courtesy of Malacanang Palace press office
In fact I felt more apprehensive because of what Mrs Arroyo told us.
When I asked her – “Maam, are you personally worried” – about the automation?
Her reply did not give comfort. First she said, “Um”, and she looked up at the ceiling. Then she said, more like talking to herself, “I’m worried. I’m worried, but I – I have to go by what the Comelec said.”
Dear readers, tell me if I’m being paranoid by reading more than what the President really told us.
Help me out here by reading for yourself what President Arroyo (GMA) said – word for word – on poll automation during our dinner . I would like to thank a colleague in FOCAP for providing me with the specific quotes reprinted below:
FOCAP MEMBER: THERE ARE CONCERNS ABOUT THE AUTOMATION PROCESS.
GMA: Ya, thats why I called a national security council meeting. Because we needed to ask Comelec.
FOCAP MEMBER: ARE WE STILL ON SCHEDULE?
GMA:Ya, that’s what the Comelec said.
FOCAP MEMBER: WHAT ASPECT ARE YOU WORRIED ABOUT, OF AUTOMATION?
GMA: Well, it’s not been tested. So we expressed the concern that everybody —
FOCAP MEMBER (ME): MAAM, ARE YOU PERSONALLY WORRIED?
GMA: Um – I’m worried. I’m worried, but I – I have to go by what the Comelec said.
FOCAP MEMBER: WHAT IF IT FAILS?
GMA: They said it might fail in some – some areas. But it cannot, but not nationally.
FOCAP MEMBER: WHAT ABOUT THE AUTOMATION ARE YOU WORRIED ABOUT?THE COUNTING,THE–
GMA: I don’t know, I don’t know. It’s just that –
FOCAP MEMBER (ME): YOU’RE UNEASY
GMA: I don’t know. Like all of you. Like all of you. It’s more –
FOCAP MEMBER: WHAT STEPS ARE YOU DOING TO AVOID A FAILURE OF ELECTIONS?
GMA: We have to support the Comelec in everything they want to do. It’s their primary responsiblity but we’re suporting them. That’s why we called a National Security Council meeting. To ask them what they would need. We’ve made the budget tthat they need available.
FOCAP MEMBER: LET’S KEEP OUR FINGERS CROSSED.
GMA: They said they’re not entertaining a failure of elections
FOCAP MEMBER: NANDON BA ANG (IS THERE A )BACKUP PLAN IF EVER?
GMA: You know I can’t be their spokesman. You have to ask them. But then they made a presentation. What about failure of elections. They said there may be some but only in isolated areas, but not nationwide.
FOCAP MEMBER: SO WHAT DID THEY SAY IN SOME ISOLATED AREAS
GMA: Same as now. It happens. So they have their mechanism. But it doesnt affect the national anymore.
FOCAP MEMBER: THEY ASSURED YOU IT WON’T BE MASSIVE FAILURE
GMA: That’s what they said. They’re not entertaining national failure of elections, maybe in some isolated areas but not nationwide.
FOCAP MEMBER: DID THEY MENTION TO YOU ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF PARALLEL MANUAL COUNT?
GMA: They did not say.
FOCAP MEMBER (DANA BATNAG OF JIJI PRESS: – YOU SAID COMELEC IS NOT ENTERTAINING THE POSSIBILITY. DOES THAT MEAN THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT IS NOT PREPARING FOR THE POSSIBLITY OF A FAILURE OF ELECTIONS? OR ARE THERE PREPARATIONS?
GMA: As far as we are concerend, we would rather prepare to help Comelec succeed.
FOCAP MEMBER: IN CASE IT HAPPENS
GMA: You know, they said it’s not going to happen. So we take their word for it.
Since our Friday dinner, pronouncements from the Comelec have made me even warier.
Last Wednesday, Comelec Commissioner Armand Velasco told congressmen that they are prepared to do a manual count for 30% of the votes as part of their backup plan.
Do you know how big 30% is?
The registered voters now number 48,275,594 and 30% of that is 14.482 million.
That would definitely affect the outcome of the presidential polls.
Just to give you an idea, I will use some comparative figures that Ellen Tordesillas recently provided in her blog. She noted the following:
- Fidel Ramos won in 1992 with only 5,342,321 votes.
- Joseph Estrada won in 1998 with 10,722,295 votes or 31.39% of registered voters then.
- In 2004, Mrs Arroyo was credited with 12,905,808 votes or 29.64% of registered voters.
Given these trends, we should not be worried with an automation failure rate that could affect as much as 14.4 million voters?
There are other things I’m worried about. When I was listening to Wednesday’s Comelec and Smartmatic presentation before Senator Francis Escudero’s Senate committee, I realized that the automation left very little margin for error as far as ballot distribution is concerned.
Let me explain. In all our elections, Comelec only had to send out the number of ballots for each precinct nationwide plus a little extra for spoilage.
Now, because all the local candidates’ names from congressman down to councilor are printed at the back of each ballot, Comelec has to be very precise in delivering to every area.
In Quezon City for instance, ballots for District 1 should only go to District 1 and not anywhere else. Otherwise, the name of the candidates for congressman would be wrong. For the same reason, ballots for Quezon City cannot go to Manila since the names of the candidates for mayors and city councilors would be wrong.
For the first time, Comelec would have to practice that kind of precision especially in far-flung areas.
And some candidates could take advantage by finding ways for ballots, intended for certain areas where they are weak, to be diverted somewhere else.
From what I have seen of candidates’ behavior in previous polls, I am certain there are candidates who are even now trying to find ways to game the system for to their own advantage.
January 29, 2010 | Posted by raissa robles
Categories:
Tags:
from what i gather, smartmatic is a venezuelan software company, the very same software that made chavez won.
so, gloria has got nothing to worry about.
“si senor” has already been programmed to say “opo ma’am”
I think they should plan for a complete parallel run during this election. Meaning, all precincts should have a manual as well as an automated counting. This will serve two purposes. First, as a back-up in case the automation fails for certain precincts. And more importantly, as the final validation of the Poll Automation process. So that when we have the next elections there will no longer be any questions on the validity of the process.